1. Exquisite Tweets from @SocialHistoryOx

    PreoccupationsCollected by Preoccupations

    I suppose I'd better explain this a bit....

    Jonathan Healey @SocialHistoryOx
    Was the pre-existence of a national system of tax-funded, redistributive poor relief crucial to England's economic take-off from c.1700?

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    In the 16th century, England created a national system of poor relief....

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    The essence of the system, in place by 1601, was that each parish would tax its wealthy inhabitants and give money to the needy poor.

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    England was uniquely successful in establishing this system across the country, by the 1640s everywhere from London to Northumberland.

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    By the 1690s, redistributive tax was capable of feeding around 5% of the population, a major achievement for an early modern state.

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    This undoubtedly helped England become (probably) the first country to permanently escape famine (the last one was in 1623).

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    It may have helped prevent popular rebellion, and by ensuring people were relieved in their home parishes, it reduced the spread of disease.

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    Most interestingly, the historian Peter Solar suggested that the safety net provided by the poor law allowed ordinary people to take risks.

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    So, if they wanted to sell the farm and become - say - a cotton weaver or iron-worker, they knew they had a social security safety net.

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    For similar reasons, it may have helped allow internal migration (thought this is hotly debated), to industrial and urban areas...

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    But more generally, it helped provide valuable security for people at a time of unstable marketisation and industrial growth. So, yay!

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey

    (although in the C19th it was decided that the system was too generous and encouraged idleness, so they basically dismantled it. Bastards).

    Reply Retweet Like

    SocialHistoryOx

    Jonathan Healey