Interesting thing about this bit of textual sophistry: it fails on its own terms, because it misrepresents Norgrove's letter.
6:18pm Sep 17th 2017 via Twitter for iPhone
6:35pm Sep 17th 2017 via Twitter for iPhone
Norgrove didn't say what Johnson says he said. He objected to Boris mentioning 350m "in connection with the amount that might be available".
6:37pm Sep 17th 2017 via Twitter for iPhone in reply to ProfChalmers
Norgrove didn't, in fact, claim Johnson said £350m would be available to spend. He was objecting to the figure being used at all.
6:40pm Sep 17th 2017 via Twitter for iPhone in reply to ProfChalmers
Johnson's letter elevates this already stupid episode to a level of terminal silliness. What is he trying to achieve?
6:41pm Sep 17th 2017 via Twitter for iPhone in reply to ProfChalmers
Connect with Twitter
A website by @jwheare