1. Exquisite Tweets from @DougShadle

    uchennangweCollected by uchennangwe

    1/ Thread about Systemic Discrimination in Orchestras inspired by comments about prominent orchs neglecting women composers. Thoughts stem largely from the short history of the @chicagosymphony I just finished for @UChicagoPress.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    2/ To define "systemic discrimination" - I mean racism, sexism, and other biases that cut across organizations. This concept is especially important for understanding how discrimination infects Hollywood, the pop music industry, academia, and other "left-leaning" fields.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    3/ Systemic discrimination *relies on* an individual's abdication of responsibility for the problem. "I'm not sexist," you say, as you sign off on the all-male program for the year. "It's not my problem to fix."

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    4/ It's useful, then, to think about how the interlocking parts of "the system" work together to breed discrimination and allow it to fester, like a wound that goes untreated. The moving parts I'll address are: Programming Directors, Conductors/Soloists, Marketers, and Patrons

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    5/ And let's not forget that we are talking about real people's lives here. Discrimination affects the material and emotional well-being of its victims.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    6/ PDs - There's a great story in the @chicagotribune about Martha Gilmer (now CEO of @SanDiegoSymph) and her working methods as VP of Programming for the CSO. In the "old days" she would set out note cards in a calendar with things like soloists, conductors, composers, & pieces.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    7/ It's a delicate process because these folks often need to be booked 2-3 if not 5-6 years in advance. A single season comes together in a piecemeal fashion, making it difficult to think about a year-long arc. ---> easy to miss forest for trees and "overlook" lack of diversity.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    8/ C/S - If we add conductors and soloists to the mix, we encounter a factor that complicates the work of even the most progressive PD: these folks have limited repertoires and are typically averse to learning new works.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    9/ Sociological research on performance explains that the rewards (both financial and cultural) for "sounding good" (i.e., virtuosic) are far greater than the esteem that accompanies a premiere (or "liberality"). Therefore C/S's have very little external incentive to "innovate."

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    10/ Music directors rarely appear for more than 10-12 weeks and can get away with a limited repertoire that can be stretched over 3-5 years. S's appear only once a season and only need not play what an S on the same instrument is playing elsewhere in the same year.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    11/ Guest C's therefore function more like soloists and only need not conflict with the MD.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    12/ Put it all together, and C's fill in gaps with repertoire that is no trouble to learn. Why else do you think so many concerts start with a Berlioz or Rossini overture? (Pace Bernard Haitink, who learned Haydn's Creation in his 80s.)

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    13/ In all ---> Protecting self-interest inhibits diversification.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    14/ So far, this whole situation is a dream for marketers, who can rely on well-known images of public figures (Mozart, for example, or a crazy-haired old male conductor) to create a visually attractive marketing campaign for a dull season.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    15/ Mature women and PoC present "problems" (i.e., actual work) for marketers because public images are often less "sexy" (in the case of mature women) or rarer (in the case of PoC).

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    16/ How do I know? A conductor (and woman of color) once told me that she was denied a music directorship because, "We don't know how to market you." That was in 2007, not 1957.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    17/ Marketers also have a built-in way to pitch the canon: "Greatness." There is no real need to sell Beethoven or Mozart--simply focus on supposed universal greatness. That's the strategy, literally.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    18/ I'll never forget the concert ad for a Dvorak symphony I saw on FB that read, "Dvorak was the greatest symphonist of his age, save perhaps for Brahms." Not exactly a ringing endorsement, but throw the words "great" and "Brahms" in there--Done. Who are they kidding?

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    19/ Marketing is where programming and musicians interface with patrons. The result is that the marketers reify an ignorant public that simply wants to devour greatness at every opportunity. ---> No need to look elsewhere for material.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    20/ Finally, patrons themselves. I think patrons are the least complicit in the situation, but they certainly play a role. I sympathize, e.g., with a regular subscriber who wants to hear the MD excel alongside the orchestra as a whole.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    21/ Hearing a Mahler 2, or a Bruckner 7, or the Rite of Spring is thrilling when a virtuosic orchestra synergizes with an insightful conductor. *Those opportunities are rare because of the scheduling system.*

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    22/ Audiences are not apt to complain when they get to hear the high-flying MD direct their favorite pieces for the first time, or second time in 5 years (or 10!). Some patrons also probably become habituated to the standard repertoire, perhaps thinking it's "all there is."

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    23/ ---> No cage rattling for diversity. This is how echo chambers take shape. Virtually everyone in this equation likely sees lack of diversity as a problem, but it's not *their* problem.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    24/ Some orchs make ancillary efforts to "solve" the problem but ultimately mask it. Students in a seminar of mine examined *local* images on orch websites and compared them to diversity of programming. Rainbows in the images; terrible rep. Zero correlation.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle

    25/ How to solve? Here's what I do: Amplify the voices of experience, buy CDs of diverse repertoire, and refuse to pay for the same old thing. Would love to hear more.

    Reply Retweet Like

    DougShadle

    Doug Shadle