1. Exquisite Tweets from @evil_diad

    Woody_WongECollected by Woody_WongE

    1/ Iโ€ฆIโ€ฆI taught a mini-course on writing for economists this week and Iโ€™m justโ€ฆtweeting it out (in abridged form, ~50 tweets)

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    2/ Mantra: You are a writer. Who writes about econ. Your final product is your written word. Make it good. It matters. You are a writer.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    3/ If you write well, youโ€™ll retain more readers, and they will retain more of what you write (to tell their friends)

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    4/ Whatโ€™s good writing? Itโ€™s clear. If itโ€™s clear, it can be concise. If itโ€™s concise, it can be engaging.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    4/a These goals are not in tension - clarity allows you to deliver more meaning with fewer words, and therefore be more concise.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    4/b Clarity also helps you keep your readerโ€™s attention.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    5/ Writing well is hard because you have to imagine (or remember) what it would be like not to know what you already know

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    6/ Many academics are shy about having a point they want to convince the reader of. Having a point seems biased somehow.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    6/a But you have a point. Youโ€™re not going to be polemical about it, but you have a point. Be bold about it. Say it early and often.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    6/b IMPORTANT: Your point is not that you are smart. If the reader feels dumber than you, youโ€™re probably not writing well.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    6/c Great writing makes the reader feel smarter, not dumber.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    7/ Writing well is hard work. If it seems easy, youโ€™re probably doing it wrong.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    9/ Same idea from author of King James Bible, good writer (be like the author of the King James Bible):

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    10/ Weโ€™re gonna have the best words. And then the best sentences. Then paragraphs. Then papers.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    10/a I will give you general advice, but youโ€™ll learn more in the hours spent reading and editing your own work.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    12/ Cliches let lazy or mixed metaphors slip by unchallenged. Avoid.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    13/ Jargon limits your audience needlessly (and often leads to confusion since jargon defns often slip as use spreads)

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    14/ Eliminate the needless phrases that pad your writing, especially those that express only vague relationships.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    15/ Be as precise as possible. It helps to know shades of meaning that differentiate similar words. (get a usage dictionary to help)

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    16/ Mashing a bunch of nouns together sounds scholarly but is not.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    17/ You know those Russian novels where every character has like 8 different names? Donโ€™t do that in your econ paper.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    17/a If you use a different word to refer to the same thing, readers will get confused, since the different word signals a change

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    19/ Remember: You have a point. Donโ€™t be shy about it.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    19/a (Unless you're just wrong. Sometimes you realize that when forcing yourself to write clearly.)

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    20/ Abstractions sound scholarly, but they are missiles aimed at the readerโ€™s understanding and attention.

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ

    20/a Recall the section from the King James bible: itโ€™s memorable b/c concrete (โ€œrace to the swiftโ€); bad version is all abstract

    Reply Retweet Like

    evil_diad

    David ๐ŸŒ