1. Exquisite Tweets from @baeblade_future, @mconnor, @doingitwrong, @lizhenry, @b6n, @betsythemuffin

    blechCollected by blech

    Missing tweet: 372759666608312321

  2. Protected tweet: 372780000363048960
    You might be able to see it if you sign in with Twitter.

  3. Missing tweet: 372780764863033344

  4. Protected tweet: 372781494621585408
    You might be able to see it if you sign in with Twitter.

  5. Protected tweet: 372781572514000896
    You might be able to see it if you sign in with Twitter.

  6. Missing tweet: 372781855382056960

  7. Missing tweet: 372781951918551041

  8. Missing tweet: 372782160173748224

  9. @jason_pontin @shanley So is literally murdering competition but there’s a reason that’s illegal.

    Reply Retweet Like

    baeblade_future

    Bae Blade 🏳️‍⚧️

  10. @shanley @lizhenry @jason_pontin well, except that's not what he's saying. You can't discriminate when hiring, but can when cofounding.

    Reply Retweet Like

    mconnor

    Mike Connor

  11. @jason_pontin @shanley That you think an ability to ignore anti-discrimination laws is a competitive advantage is why we have those laws.

    Reply Retweet Like

    doingitwrong

    Tim Maly

  12. @mconnor @shanley @jason_pontin I notice Graham does not mention worrying about hiring men who have small children or babies. Only women.

    Reply Retweet Like

    lizhenry

    Liz Henry

  13. @lizhenry @shanley @jason_pontin I may be giving him the benefit of the doubt, but his later comments could apply equally both ways.

    Reply Retweet Like

    mconnor

    Mike Connor

  14. Missing tweet: 372796631617245184

  15. @jason_pontin You said he is "in the right", so I'm taking it up with you, too.

    Reply Retweet Like

    b6n

    benjamin black

  16. @jason_pontin @techreview @shanley How seriously can you take diversity if you feel that deliberately discarding it will provide advantages?

    Reply Retweet Like

    betsythemuffin

    betsythemuffin