1. Exquisite Tweets from @PREAUX_FISH, @JacquelynGill, @_JimAustin, @docfreeride, @seelix, @debcha, @drugmonkeyblog, @Marcia4Science

    blechCollected by blech

    When we said we wanted more women in Science this is not what we meant. @AAASmember pic.twitter.com/RDD9zXfh6j

    Reply Retweet Like

    PREAUX_FISH

    Prosanta Chakrabarty

  2. !!! RT @LSU_FISH When we said we wanted more women in Science this is not what we meant. @AAASmember pic.twitter.com/oi4rrt5cuv

    Reply Retweet Like

    JacquelynGill

    Dr. Jacquelyn Gill

  3. @JacquelynGill @LSU_FISH @AAASmember You realize they are transgender? Does it matter? That at least colors things, no?

    Reply Retweet Like

    _JimAustin

    Jim Austin

  4. @SciCareerEditor It’s not clear from the cover image. I don’t think it’s ok to sexually objectify transwomen, either. @LSU_FISH @AAASmember

    Reply Retweet Like

    JacquelynGill

    Dr. Jacquelyn Gill

  5. @JacquelynGill @LSU_FISH @AAASmember To me it defies the obvious stereotypes, problemetizes responses in interesting ways.

    Reply Retweet Like

    _JimAustin

    Jim Austin

  6. Tip for photo-editors: cropping people's heads out of shots of their bodies is kind of dehumanizing. Try a different image.

    Reply Retweet Like

    docfreeride

    Dr. Janet D. Stemwedel, PhD 🏳️‍🌈

  7. Missing tweet: 489528456783224833

  8. So, it's cool to dehumanize women on the cover of @ScienceMagazine as long as they're transwomen. Cool story, bro. twitter.com/scicareeredito…

    Jim Austin @JacquelynGill @LSU_FISH @AAASmember You realize they are transgender? Does it matter? That at least colors things, no?

    Reply Retweet Like

    seelix

    Emily

  9. Missing tweet: 489542155153571840

  10. @meanlouise It's defying the stereotype of scientists and those in related fields are smarter than other people. So that's something.

    Reply Retweet Like

    seelix

    Emily

  11. Missing tweet: 489543344347836418

  12. @seelix @ScienceMagazine @tcarmody Boy, it must be nice to have the luxury of thinking 'moral indignation is boring' twitter.com/SciCareerEdito…

    Reply Retweet Like

    debcha

    Deb Chachra

  13. Not really. There are boatloads of selfish privileged white dudes who don't give a shit about anybody else's concerns @SciCareerEditor

    Reply Retweet Like

    drugmonkeyblog

    Drug Monkey

  14. From us at Science, we apologize to those offended by recent cover. Intent was to highlight solutions to HIV, and it badly missed the mark.

    Reply Retweet Like

    Marcia4Science

    Marcia McNutt